Box 1 Whither Comparative Advantage in Thai Rice Production?

Rice remains Thailand’s principal crop, accounting for 29 percent of total crop value added in 1994. Thailand is also the world’s top exporter of rice, which may be attributed to its long-term comparative production advantage and the gradual decline of domestic per capita consumption of rice from 172 kg per head in 1968, to 119 kg per head in 1990 (Nipon 1996).

In the early 1980s, falling rice prices and the exhaustion of land resources put increasing strain on the maintenance of the past growth rates of production. However, the problems could be largely overcome by yield improvements (from 528 kg/rai in 1980 to 721 kg/rai in 1996). In contrast, the labor and water shortages of the 1990s have not been tackled yet and, thus, pose serious threats to the future productivity and competitiveness of Thai rice production.

In the early 20th century, Thai rice production suffered from chronic labor shortages. However, the problem was usually overcome by simply shifting from “transplanting” to the less labor-intensive, but also less productive “broadcasting” method of cultivation. Given the depletion of land resources in the 1980s, yield improvements have become more important, such that most of the current rice production is conducted by the “transplanting method.” Shifting back to “broadcasting” in response to the labor shortage is not a feasible option anymore, as the loss in productivity would be difficult to compensate for. Instead, increased mechanization of Thailand’s rice production is required. However, while the process of land preparation and harvesting in “broadcasting” has already been mechanized, the general level of mechanization in “transplanting” is low. As a result, the recent labor shortage has had severe impacts on total rice production. In the period from 1989 to 1990, the total area cultivated with rice fell from 64.677 million rai to 60.677 million rai. Similarly, although there has been a long-term increase in total rice production, there has been a recent decrease from 21.3 million tons in 1989 to 21.1 million tons in 1995 (Office of Agricultural Economics).

The current water shortage has also already affected rice production as the planted area for dry-season rice has shown a declining trend in the 1990s. The water scarcity has encouraged a great number of farmers to switch to cultivating higher valued, less water-intensive crops. The government has also promoted this process through its “restructuring” policies by adopting a measure to stop providing water for the dry-season crop (TDRI 1995).

In a nutshell, the long-term sustainability of Thailand’s competitive rice production crucially depends on a more efficient utilization of water resources and increased mechanization of transplanting methods. If not addressed adequately, persistent shortages of water and labor will certainly further reduce total rice output, which will eventually result in declining exports and Thailand’s loss of its position as the world’s top exporter of rice.